The Dan Lee Report

It’s a REALLY big day for those of us who know we have the right to bear arms for protection. The question is, will the Supreme Court Justices side with the people & the strict constitutionalists? Or will they go the way of the revisionist historians who have twisted the phrase from the first amendment which reads: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” to mean that Christians, Christian values, or Religion itself, should have no say in Government, which of course is bunk, since we have throughout much of our nation’s history sworn in our officials on the Holy Christian Bible, marked our court documents with the phrase “in the year of Our Lord ” (Drives insane liberals even more insane) ect..

If the Justices do their job without prejudice, the following constitutional phrase will be confirmed as an individual right to bear arms: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Revisionist historians will try to say of course that a “militia” is not an individual. This is of course not true. If you look at the definition below at the Merriam-Webster definitions, you’ll see that not only does the first definition (a.) call a militia “a part of the organized armed forces of a country liable to call only in emergency”, but the latin also defines it simply as “military service”. This means that even if the “militia” argument is used, we are still individual components of any militia, with a right to bear arms. There is no definition in the Constitution that defines how many people must be in a militia, or even how many militias may operate within a given state.

Main Entry: mi·li·tia
Function: noun
Etymology: Latin, military service, from milit-, miles
Date: 1625
1 a:a part of the organized armed forces of a country liable to call only in emergency b: a body of citizens organized for military service
2: the whole body of able-bodied male citizens declared by law as being subject to call to military service

It then follows that if you look at the definition of “military”, it’s also clear that any individual can indeed fit the bill.

Main Entry: mil·i·tary
Pronunciation: \ˈmi-lə-ˌter-ē\
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Latin militaris, from milit-, miles soldier
Date: 15th century

1 a: of or relating to soldiers, arms, or war b: of or relating to armed forces; especially : of or relating to ground or sometimes ground and air forces as opposed to naval forces
2 a: performed or made by armed forces b: supported by armed force
3: of or relating to the army

So in conclusion, it’s clear to me that we do indeed have a right to bear arms as individuals. Nothing the Supreme Court says will change that fact, but rather my prediction is that their decision will just be another factor that state militias will likely use to determine whether or not they should mobilize against rogue forces in our government. I don’t think any sane person would want that to happen, so the hope is that the court will not agree to infringe upon the rights of United States citizens. It would be a very dangerous trend to follow for this country. ~Dan Lee

More on this from Michelle Malkin.

March 6, 2008

A California State appellate court says those who teach children in private must have a “credential”.

Parents who lack teaching credentials cannot educate their children at home, according to a state appellate court ruling that is sending shock waves of anger through California’s home schooling families.

We all know what’s behind the ruling. If the liberals in California can’t get at Conservative Christian children, how an they possibly brainwash them into accepting the gay lifestyle, teach them that their own country is evil & responsible for every problem the world faces, & teach them that the bible is a fairy tale, & evolution is fact? They can’t! & they are fuming over it.

So now they want to violate people’s constitutional rights by telling them they can’t teach their own children.

How then will they enforce this? Are they going to come into people’s homes & take the children away?

If this ruling in California stands, I for one think the gun industry will benefit greatly. The sale of assault rifles & other weapons needed to protect people from a rogue Government will have a tremendous spike once people feel the threat of government trying to take their children away, or forcing them into substandard public schools to have their minds sodomized, while violating their constitutional & more importantly God given right to freedom.

If any of you fools who think you have a right to tell other people what to teach their children are reading this, I implore you to think through this carefully. Because if you thought the wild west was bad, just start trying to take people’s children out of their homes to suit your political & social ideological agendas.

The results will be VERY, VERY deadly bad..

The second amendment gives us the right to bear arms. It also gives us the right to assemble militias to protect ourselves against evil people, & rogue governments.

Nowhere in the Constitution is it stated that the Government has the right to teach our children, or mandate the direction of their teaching, in any way.

It’s a very bad idea to start a civil war in our country, because there are people that will certainly fight it. Time for the rabbid leftists to back off, for the good of the nation as a whole. This threat against the very foundations of our freedom is something people are, & have been willing to fight for to the death if necessary. I don’t think there’s any need for us to go backwards & settle old arguments, but If you try to take children out of homes, or disrupt the lives of good people to force indoctrinate their children, it’s just going to get very, very ugly in this country. Remember I said it, & it was forewarned.. I hope they heed it, instead of pushing good people’s backs against the wall, & causing them to react to defend themselves. ~Dan Lee

More on this here..