Via Fox News:
U.S. troops serving in Iraq may be getting more letters during mail call, but they won’t be care packages — one group is sending them letters and DVDs claiming 9/11 was an “inside job” and that they should rethink why they’re fighting.
Mark Dice, founder of The Resistance, which he calls a media watchdog group, says that the U.S. government was responsible for the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and that the armed forces should know it.
You know, people like this really do make me wish that Darwin was right sometimes.. When you’re THIS stupid & ignorant, natural selection starts to sound good to those around you.. But for the grace of God, I would wish for this man’s tongue to fall out, & for his fingers to fall off.
It’s nothing short of tragic to watch the once widely admired & trusted main stream media in the United States, just morally implode on themselves.
Borrowing from the playbooks of other media nuts & special interest groups, Time Magazine recently defaced the timeless & iconic photo of the flag rising at Iwo Jima, to try and make a completely unjustified comparison; the horrific suffering at Iwo Jima to the ever crumbling theory of Global Warming. The conspiracy of the left & their media surrogates is revealed by this recent statement by liberal Colorado Republocrat Rhino Senator, Nancy Spence.
Nancy Spence, for The Denver Post : “Now that climate change is on magazine covers and being debated by presidential candidates, the question is what kind of policy both Republicans and Democrats will support. It will have to be a policy that actually cuts the carbon pollution that is believed to contribute to climate change and creates new opportunities for workers and businesses. … Bipartisan leaders are coming forward to cut pollution that may contribute to global warming. … America’s Climate Security Act, which would create a national cap-and-trade system (on greenhouse emissions) … is something Republicans and Democrats alike can support on Earth Day and throughout the years ahead.”
Notice how she’s joined the other chameleons who have evolved this political farce from Global Warming, to a more vague & nonspecific name of “Climate Change?” That’s because it’s a political demon who will consume anything in it’s path, including the memories of our wounded or killed veterans & every Japanese causaulty that was suffered on those fateful days at Iwo Jima.
At TIME magazine they are marching in fascist lockstep with the rest of the Liberal media machine that has buried the fact that the earth has been cooling for the last year & a half. Even our own government environmental agencies are saying so.
Of course the new term “Climate Change” is in anticipation of the saving of face liberals are going to need to do as the planet does what it’s always done, (whatever it wants, whenever it wants.)
Despite overwhelming evidence that their little cult is falling apart, Time managing editor Richard Stengel appeared on MSNBC April 17 and said the United States needed to make a major effort to fight climate change, and that the cover’s purpose was to liken global warming to World War II.
“[O]ne of the things we do in the story is we say there needs to be an effort along the lines of preparing for World War II to combat global warming and climate change,” Stengel said. “It seems to me that this is an issue that is very popular with the voters, makes a lot of sense to them and a candidate who can actually bundle it up in some grand way and say, ‘Look, we need a national and international Manhattan Project to solve this problem and my candidacy involves that.’ I don’t understand why they don’t do that.”
Oh really Mr. Stengel? Perhaps you were too busy inspecting the inside of your bowels with your own head to read this survey?
Mr. Stengel isn’t fit to walk on the same soil as the men who fought on Iwo Jima, yet he spews his pompous comparisons as if he has any idea what horrors these men went through, or what it means to have courage. Even worse, he has used the freedom these men fought to defend to betray them & the memory of their brothers in arms, using Time Magazine as the vehicle of delivery for his insult. Talk about adding insult to injury. My personal message to Mr. Stengel and his cronies is, if I ever meet any of you, I will be sure and let you know that I think you are disrespectful, poor excuses for human beings & cowards. I’d much rather say it to your faces, but I’m sure you’re all hiding under your desks right now.
In any case, there will come a day when all of you spoiled children of Democracy will pay with your souls for the hatred of your own country & anything that involves individual thought for that matter.
Time Magazine is a good name for your publication, because your “TIME” is certainly going to come.
We knew to was coming, but I’m disappointed (so far) at the lack of counter opinions on many of the media/movie review sites.
I mean I know that this is due in part to the fact that most Conservatives have children to take care of, (because they didn’t abort them all) & because they have jobs they need to go to instead of having their hand out as a Liberal minion, or being one of those who spend their all time making sure the successful vote buying of the Democrats continues. I realize that these who collect welfare at the expense of those who are at work all day, do have more time to sit home & write more negative reviews on Ben Stein’s brilliant movie “Expelled”. However, we need to take time to defend truth, since these attackers are only interested in squashing it to protect their world views, their Government grants, & their welfare checks.
One thing that has been missed in the debate is this; How can you advocate liberal style “separation” of church & state, & then dutifully investigate intelligent design as a so called “scientist”?
The answer is, you can’t! Something has to give, or you don’t get any grant money. This is one of the reasons they hate the idea, & would rather stay in their little financial & ideological comfort zones!
The fact that these people don’t like the movie doesn’t bother me. What bothers me is the blatant lying they do while writing their reviews. Like one reviewer on Apple.com who said; “Darwin didn’t cause the Holocaust.” Nowhere in Stein’s movie does he say that Darwinism alone was sufficient to lead to the events. In fact, in the movie Stein himself says that though many of the principles of Darwin were believed by Hitler, he doesn’t think that was the only factor that led to the Holocaust. Other’s interviewed in the movie came to the same conclusion.
What is amazing to me is how badly todays Scientists have turned on science itself, & traded in the principled questioning & searching for answers, for the protection of their own political, social or religious ideologies. For instance, like it or not, their atheism is a “faith” of sorts. It takes faith to believe anything that you weren’t around to see. Scientists & Darwinists can cry all they want but that’s a fact they can’t change no matter how hard they try.
Most notably in Steins movie, the flagship or Darwinism Richard Dawkins is cornered by logic itself, into admitting that Intelligent design is possible. On a comical note though, he feebly tries to save face for the movement by suggesting that a superior race of beings could have created the first cell & then disappeared. Yes, he actually suggested Aliens were possibly responsible, but yet he call those who believe in God delusional?
Huh? If they were superior to us or God, then where did they go? & where did they come from in the first place? What did they make the cell from?
Very disappointing showing by Mr. Dawkins to say the least. It was almost sad to watch him reduced to intellectual cannon fodder by Ben Stein.
In any case, you need to ignore the flood of leftist reviews that are trying to slander the movie, & silence it. (You know, those leftist champions of free speech & the media.)
Yes, they want to silence Ben Stein, & anyone who they don’t agree with. The movie stands on it’s own, & I’d encourage anyone to go see it & make up your own mind, instead of listening to fascist liberals who will go as far as to blatantly lie about it, to convince people not to go.
I do however also encourage you to look around the web & read their venomous reviews. Ask yourself why they are so angry? Why so viscous? What are they so afraid of? If the movie is so ridiculous & pointless as they claim, then why are they spending their time defending Darwin & attacking Ben Stein’s “Expelled” so veraciously?
It’s because they want to pontificate to you about what’s suitable for your viewing, & tell you what you should watch. Didn’t Hitler burn books? Create a state run media? Try to control the knowledge & communication?
Go see the movie while you live in a country where you can make up your own mind. Because if you don’t? There will come a day where the right you didn’t exercise, becomes a right you’ve lost.
I really can’t imagine why this desperate plea for attention would surprise anyone, but since it has, let me explain Hillary Clinton’s comments about coming under “sniper fire” in Bosnia. See, John McCain is a real war hero, Barack may have had a few bullets whiz by him in Chicago, since it’s a cesspool of crime, & politics for that matter. But at least Obama can say with some honesty that there have been people in his vicinity that probably had a gun, & would not think twice about shooting somebody they didn’t like.
Now Hillary? She was surrounded by highly trained U.S. Military when she landed in Bosnia, & as has been reported, came under no fire by anyone. Instead she took a photo op with a little girl that was standing by. So, she’s feeling kind of left out in the Hero area. Maybe an unsupervised stroll through Compton California would be a good remedy for that? It would be a good opportunity for her to connect with some of the inner city folks there, & perhaps by chance, she would come under fire from a myriad of different weapons whereby her next claim of being a hardened veteran of war would be almost true?
See Hillary air the lies that disrespect our troops who are actually in harms way (Gunshot sounds added for comedic value):
Hillary’s response to Will Bunch of the Daily News was as follows:
“‘No, I went to 80 countries, you know. I gave contemporaneous accounts, I wrote about a lot of this in my book. you know, I think that, a minor blip, you know, if I said something that, you know, I say a lot of things — millions of words a day — so if I misspoke, that was just a misstatement.’
What did she just say? Is anyone else having flashbacks of this:
I mean no offense to Miss S.C. Lauren Upton. She’s a nice & beautiful young lady who was just caught up in a “deer in the headlights moment”, whereas Hillary would have been the Peterbuilt tractor/trailer steering into, & running over the deer if it was politically expedient..
“What I really worry about is that I think the bloggers and everyone, everyone with a laptop thinks they’re journalists,” Thomas said. “And, they certainly don’t have our standards. They don’t have our ethics, and so forth. There’s a deterioration,” she continued. “Reporters laid down on the job in the run up to this [the Iraq] war.”
Thomas made those remarks in a January 4 round-table discussion that followed the premiere of a documentary about the National Press Club 100th anniversary, “The National Press Club at 100: A Century of Headlines.”
Dan Lee Comments:
As a blogger who readily admits I’m not a part of the “Journalism” profession, I’m very glad I’m not. To be a part of that largely corrupt group of so called “Professionals” known as the Main Stream Media, would be to sell my soul to the devil, for a guaranteed opportunity to force my opinions into virtually every home in America, & call it “reporting the news.”
What I am is an American citizen with a voice, who is exercising my first amendment rights out of concern for my country. I know that frightens the status quo media folks who have turned the news into information brokering, a way of controlling, brainwashing, & ultimately fleecing the masses in our country by endorsing those with whom they are politically aligned. But like anyone with a conscience & a soul that still belongs to God & themselves, I want no part of that.
The difference between bloggers & the main stream media of course, is that no blogger I’ve ever read has ever claimed to be “Your only source for News & Events”. On the contrary, we tend to link to competitors who may have differing opinion, because we believe in a system of checks & balances, as well as actual free speech & information sharing, not the kind of “information sifting & filtering” that’s become the norm for the old guard that Helen Thomas helped to create.
Helen Thomas & her kind are afraid of bloggers, because we represent something her “profession” as a whole lost sight of many decades ago now, & that is the ultimate higher calling of the media. It is to serve their fellow man by providing the information needed to make life decisions, (often in reaction to the information provided) based on wisdom & knowledge that we are all taught in school, or acquire through spiritual wisdom & provenial grace.
We don’t need the media to make up our minds for us, or arbitrarily filter the information to us that they feel is relevant, or in their opinion “important”, but yet somehow the media has made themselves the gatekeepers of all common sense & relevance. The “news” they “allow” us to see or here is “the gospel according to their editors”, instead of a word for word, or pictured chronicle of events.
To Helen Thomas; The problem your industry has is that the general public is tired of your narrow opinions about “why” news happens, & would just like you to spend more time reporting it without always needing to have an analysis or opinion, as if without you, no man or woman could make up his or own mind, & would fail to understand it. You are gatherers & disseminators of information, you are not Gods, Kings, or Queens who issue their judgments & decrees upon the rest of us.
In short Helen Thomas, you may not see me as a “journalist” with your “ethics” & “standards”, but who in hell are you to pontificate at your very readers & customers what is a good product?
I bring my car to have the oil changed not because I can’t do it myself, but because I want to spend my time doing other things. However if I can’t find a shop to do it right? I’ll do it myself again. I’ll go find out what the right Oil filter part number is for my vehicle, & buy the parts myself, & do the work myself. Similarly, when YOUR customers Helen Thomas don’t think you’re doing a good or honest service for us, WE WILL get it done with or without you, & YOU WILL HAVE TO TAKE MY LAPTOP OUT OF MY COLD DEAD HANDS BEFORE YOU STOP ME from ideating (EITHER ALONE OR WITH OTHERS) on how to make or keep the country I Love a better place. If that goes against your “journalism standards”, then DON’T READ MY BLOG YOU OLD MINDED,UNPROGRESSIVE, SELF ABSORBED COOT! How ironic that those who have the most incentive to champion the first amendment, are using it to try & suppress the free speech of others selectively.
Well Mr. Gore, What do you have to say about that? The debate doesn’t seem to be quite over man!
I mean most of us with even a half of a brain knew this to be true for the longest time. But now the Comprehensive Senate Report is out to prove that Al Gore & his media co-conspirators have been selling this bunk unchallenged, because the media has buried any scientist who tries to refute him. Can we have our Edison light bulbs back now?
The IPCCwas supposed to be doing a “comprehensive report” on Global Warming, but as it turns out: Only 52 Scientists Participated in UN IPCC Summary. Not so comprehensive sounding, ey? The multiple Goregasms are going to be ending soon, & the extreme left will have to find another lover.. ~Dan Lee
Only 52 Scientists Participated inUN IPCC Summary
The over 400 skeptical scientists featured in this new report outnumber by nearly eight times the number of scientists who participated in the 2007 UN IPCC Summary for Policymakers. The notion of “hundreds” or “thousands” of UN scientists agreeing to a scientific statement does not hold up to scrutiny. (See report debunking “consensus” LINK) Recent research by Australian climate data analyst Dr. John McLean revealed that the IPCC’s peer-review process for the Summary for Policymakers leaves much to be desired. (LINK)
