I used to respect Newt Gingrich, but now he’s paling around with Kerry, Pelosi, & the like, & obviously drinking some seriously spiked kool-aid along with the rest of these politically calculating global warming nuts. Except with the earths cooling trend over the last year & a half threatening to expose the lie of Global Warming, he too uses the newest course adjusted, devious term, to describe the latest political fad of, “Climate Change“.
If you can believe it, here he is sitting with one of the Republic of the United States’ foremost enemies, Nancy Pelosi, in a propaganda ad for the Democratic Party, & the rest of the politicians who don’t have to pay for their $4.00 a gallon gasoline. He apparently no longer cares what Conservatives think, & has fallen victim to some of the brainwashing of the leftist media machine. The fake pleasentries & smiles in this video are enough to make a NYC sewer rat puke, let alone any self respecting Conservative.
Well so long Newt. Just remember, you left us, we didn’t leave you..
Now wait.. WAIT! Don’t go away! I know that last part sounds a little boring, but read on.
On Monday, PETA launched the campaign offsetalgore.com (conveniently timed for Earth Day) in an attempt to counter the effects that they say the former vice president’s meat-laden diet has on Mother Nature.
Recently a report published by the United Nations claimed that raising animals for food generates about 40 percent more greenhouse gas emissions than all the cars, trucks, ships and planes in the world combined.
Aaah but all Ye sane people gather round. Isn’t it a beautiful thing to watch when the criminally insane fascists of the world begin to turn on each other & implode while imposing their individual wills & world views on each other? Like Hillary & Obama, the more they spend their time beating each other to a pulp, the less time they have to bother us normal folks! Quick! All hail ye your local Arby’s roast beef establishment!
Finally instead of everything from hang nails to the collapse of foreign governments being Bush’s fault, SOMETHING is finally being blamed on the Greenbat Reverend Al Gore.. Now the fact that it’s all crazy junk science in the first place notwithstanding, it does prove that old saying to be true; “Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.”
Whether we sane folks like it or not, PETA has indeed become a quasi-influential organization. Today I like that..
Al’s green-battery against the rest of us is now coming full circle to bite him in his beef & pork padded fat ass, & yes, I am enjoying this tremendously. In fact, I’m enjoying this SO MUCH, that I’m going to go now, because I’m going to celebrate this monumental event by having a giant roast beef sandwich at Arby’s for lunch! Yes I am… No I’m serious… I’m going.. Now… You liberals can’t stop me by laying in front of my SUV, because you don’t know which one I’m going to!
Well Mr. Gore, What do you have to say about that? The debate doesn’t seem to be quite over man!
I mean most of us with even a half of a brain knew this to be true for the longest time. But now the Comprehensive Senate Report is out to prove that Al Gore & his media co-conspirators have been selling this bunk unchallenged, because the media has buried any scientist who tries to refute him. Can we have our Edison light bulbs back now?
The IPCCwas supposed to be doing a “comprehensive report” on Global Warming, but as it turns out: Only 52 Scientists Participated in UN IPCC Summary. Not so comprehensive sounding, ey? The multiple Goregasms are going to be ending soon, & the extreme left will have to find another lover.. ~Dan Lee
Only 52 Scientists Participated inUN IPCC Summary
The over 400 skeptical scientists featured in this new report outnumber by nearly eight times the number of scientists who participated in the 2007 UN IPCC Summary for Policymakers. The notion of “hundreds” or “thousands” of UN scientists agreeing to a scientific statement does not hold up to scrutiny. (See report debunking “consensus” LINK) Recent research by Australian climate data analyst Dr. John McLean revealed that the IPCC’s peer-review process for the Summary for Policymakers leaves much to be desired. (LINK)
